Home

Table of contents

References

Contact us


Rembrandt draughtsman & engraver

Rembrandt's Method


Bichromate gum technique


    The bichromate gum technique was invented to reproduce works without having to engrave them. Engraving was the only reproduction technique that existed until the middle of the 19th century (see for example of the very beautiful burin engraving by J. B. Danguin (1823-1894) of the portrait of Hendrickje Stoffels from 1654 and the wooden press of Plantin’s house in Antwerp). The discovery of photosensitive reproduction processes (the technique of gum dichromate is part of the whole process) around 1850 and in the field of printing the invention of the Linotype (Ottmar Mergenthaler) and the Monotype (Tolbert Lanston) around 1880 revolutionized reproduction techniques. Their purpose was to reproduce works more easily than the use of engraving and especially to make a very large number of prints.

   In 1832, Gustav Suckov discovered chromates were sensitive to light. In 1839, Mungo Ponton noticed that a paper soaked in a solution of potassium bichromate was sensitive to light. In 1840, Edmond Becquerel noted that sensitivity to light could be increased if the paper was coated with starch or gelatin. In 1852, William Henry Fox Talbot showed that colloids, such as gelatin or gum arabic, became insoluble after being mixed with potassium bichromate and after exposure to light. In 1855, Alphonse Louis Poitevin patented the charcoal process, which consists of adding charcoal to the colloid + potassium bichromate mixture. In 1858, John Pouncy used colored pigments with the gum arabic + potassium bichromate mixture, defining the bichromate gum technique and thus obtained the first colour prints. The great photographer who used the bichromate gum technique at the beginning of the 20th century was Robert Demachy.

    Watercolor or gouache are mainly made up of a binder, gum arabic, made of acacia sap, and pigments which define colour. Gum arabic is a water-soluble glue. It is said to be reversible, because after drying it can be dissolved again into water. Paints using gum arabic as a binder are reversible, and when painted and dry, they can be washed because gum arabic dissolves in water. If potassium bichromate is added to the water + gum arabic + pigment mixture, a photosensitive paint is obtained which, after exposure to UV, becomes insoluble. To make a bichromate gum print, a layer of the photosensitive mixture is painted on watercolour paper. When the photosensitive layer is dry, it is covered with a negative and exposed to UV radiation. After exposure, one puts the paper in water. The parts of the photosensitive layer which have been exposed to UV adhere to the paper, the others will dissolve in water. We can therefore reproduce a photo, a drawing, an etching or a flower ... using the technique of bichromate gum. You can superimpose several prints of different colours. It is a technique that lies between engraving, printing, painting and photography. It is a simple process which gives very good results.

    This technique is particularly well suited to reproduce Rembrandt's drawings and etchings. It does not provide a simple copy, it makes it possible to obtain stable prints which are more beautiful than photographs. It therefore offers the possibility of exploring and presenting the fascinating world of Rembrandt's drawings and studying their links with his etchings. However, it is an artisanal process which takes a long time to implement and does not allow large numbers of prints.


Omval - Rembrandt

   "Omval" (1641), {Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam}, is located in the vicinity of Amsterdam along the Amstel. This etching is a characteristic work of Rembrandt. He shows life on the river, a pedestrian speaking to the occupants of the passing ship, and above all, hardly perceptible, the lovers hidden in the foliage behind the tree. They represent freedom from religious conventions and it is a snub to religious authorities who condemned him for immoral behaviour. This etching breathes life, it does not give the impression of a frozen image. For Rembrandt the subject of the etching, the village of Omval, becomes secondary compared to life on the bank and the river. On the upper right of the print, we notice the small marks made by Rembrandt to test the needle of the etcher that allowed him to attack the coat of varnish. Rembrandt, who was oblivious of what people would say, is one of the very few engravers who could leave his experiences or even his mistakes on his plate.

   "The de Run mill in Omval" (circa 1688-90), {Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam}. Print of Jan Vincentsz van der Vinne, after Laurens Vincentsz van der Vinne. This etching, dated fifty years after Rembrandt’s, shows life on the river at Omval. It is technically a beautiful etching but it shows the difference in the treatment of subjects by Rembrandt and the freedom he breathed into his drawings and etchings.


Rembrandt (1606 - 1669)

    Rembrandt had a very strong personality, he never let himself be influenced by what people might say, conventions or fashion changes, his only concern was to represent life as it was and he let himself be guided by extraordinary inspiration and vision. This way of doing confused many of his contemporaries and great collectors. For example "The Night Watch" painting was admired but found disconcerting. His painting "The Conspiracy of the Batavians under Claudius Civilis" (1661), made at the request of the Amsterdam city hall, was rejected by the latter. Finally, some of his etchings, considered immoral or vulgar, were never acquired by certain great collectors. His way of life was considered immoral by religious authorities and many of his contemporaries, and note that even at the peak of his glory, he was never invited to Muiden Castle, where the influential circles of Amsterdam's artistic life met.

   His sentimental life was not a long, calm river. In 1634, he married Saskia van Uylenburg, his great love. His first three children did not survive, only the fourth, Titus, lived to become an adult. Saskia died in 1642. He then started a liaison with Geertje Dircx, but then again, his new love with Hendrickje Stoffels caused a particularly dramatic break with Geertje. With Hendrickje, he had a daughter, Cornelia. Hendrickje died probably of the plague in 1663 and Titus died of the plague in 1668, a year before Rembrandt.

   His works often contain hidden messages. For example, the painting "The Return of the Prodigal Sun" (1668 - 1669). Rembrandt wanted to represent the prodigal son received by his father and his mother whereas on the painting only the father receives the son, he therefore suggested the presence of the mother by painting a woman's hand and a man's hand for the father. It is painted in such a remarkable way that it is not shocking and is not noticeable at first sight. In the painting "Landscape with the Stone Bridge" (circa 1638), the light which crosses a very dark and tormented sky, illuminates the canal, the bridge and the farm, places of life, while the church receives no light.

   Rembrandt, in addition being a painter, was also an art dealer and a great collector of works, various objects and clothes which he used for his paintings. He was in constant conflict with art dealers because he wanted the works to be paid their fair price. They took revenge when they could, and came to an agreement during the sale following his bankruptcy so that the prices remained ridiculously low, leading to a colossal failure. At the height of his glory, Rembrandt made a lot of money, but spent it easily, several factors including a hazardous investment made that he could no longer repay the mortgage for his house. After his bankruptcy and the sale of all his property (1656 - 1658), Rembrandt continued to paint and produced some of his most beautiful paintings. He received some orders, but died in misery. After his death there was not enough money left to pay him a grave.

   "Self-portrait" (circa 1628-29, Benesch, B 54, circa 1629, Schatborn, S 628), {Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam}, drawing done with brush and pen, made during the Leiden period. It is one of Rembrandt's first preserved self-portraits. He made many self-portraits, drawing, etchings as well as paintings. They allowed him when he started to perfect his etching technique, to study the expression of the face to express different feelings, like fear, astonishment ..., and later to follow the evolution of his face in the course of his life. His latest painting is a self-portrait. The main characteristic of his self-portraits is the emotion and humanism that emanate from them. In his drawings, etchings and paintings, he often came to represent himself. When he was famous, many people wanted to buy a portrait of Rembrandt, which encouraged him to take self- portraits.


   "Self-portrait" (circa 1629), {Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam}, etching made from the drawing "Self-portrait" from 1628-29. It is one of the first etchings of Rembrandt, who began etchings in 1625-26. To keep the flexibility of the line and its spontaneity, Rembrandt drew on the metal plate as on a sheet of paper, and the print is reversed. The only method of engraving that allows to keep the flexibility and spontaneity of the line is the etching technique. One covers the copper plate to engrave with a varnish and draw on the varnish with a very fine needle that removes it. Then the copper plate is dropped into acid (called “eau forte” in the 17th century). The acid attacks the copper plate where the varnish has been removed by the needle. This etching will be compared with the etching "Self-portrait leaning on a stone sill" made ten years later.

   "Self-portrait leaning on a stone sill" (1639), {Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam}, etching to compare to the "Self-portrait" done in 1629. While Rembrandt is at the top of his art of engraving and achieves one of his most beautiful self-portraits, he leaves on the right of the etching the preliminaries of a sketch and a series of pencil lines (stones of the wall). The latter shows that this print is probably one of the first and that Rembrandt wondered if he would continue working on it. He considered that the plaque was finished and left it in this state. The only thing that interested him is the representation of the expression of his face and the luxury of his clothes. The sketched outlines show that he did not care about conventions and did not take himself seriously. The sale of prints of his etchings was a regular, and not negligible, source of income. This etching will be followed by the painting "Self-portrait at the age of 34".


   The transparency used in the bichromate gum technique to make the copy of the etching "Self-portrait Leaning on a Stone Sill" (1639). The transparency is placed on the sheet painted with photosensitive watercolor and the whole is exposed to UV radiation. The radiation passes through the transparency in the white areas that are transparent. After exposure, the paper is put into water. The parts of the photosensitive layer that have been exposed to UV adhere to the paper, the others will dissolve in the water. This gives a reproduction of Rembrandt's etching. The UV exposure time depends on the color of the chosen watercolor. The transparency in the technique of gum bichromate is the equivalent of the metal plate in engraving.



Drawings

   We will focus on Rembrandt's drawings, as well as his etchings which are inseparable from his drawings. Both were Rembrandt's preferred tools to carry out his experiences, namely how to represent life as he could observe it around him. Rembrandt was one of the greatest draughtsman and engraver of all time. He was with Katsushika Hokusai (1760 - 1849) and Käthe Kollwitz (1867 - 1945), the one who best expressed the feelings of the humans and animals he drew, the atmosphere of the scenes or landscapes he wanted to represent.

    The first characteristic of his drawings are the freedom of the line and the way he used to draw, which was sometimes completely unpredictable. In his documentary “Le mystère Picasso” (1956), Henri-Georges Clouzot, tried to answer the question: what happens in the brain of a painter when he is working? We can find Rembrandt's creative approach by looking at how his preparatory, sometimes very rudimentary drawings allowed him to produce a masterpiece. He did so when he felt ready, sometimes after several years of reflection. The final result, technically unbeatable, looks exactly the same as the greatest magic tricks: it seems easy but in fact it is technically incomprehensible, in a word, at first sight perfect (see for example the etching: "The Hundred Guilder Print" and its preliminary studies). The different stages of his work show all the issues he solved. In a first step, he analyzed the problems of movement or construction. In a second stage, when he had understood the problems of movement and general construction, he focused on the expression of the characters or animals and the reproduction of the atmosphere of the scene which he described. In a third step, he placed shadows and lights to indicate the volumes and the hierarchy of plans. Rembrandt also liked to copy the old masters.


    He probably made sketches every day. In forty years, on the basis of three sketches a day, he has made a minimum of forty thousand sketches or drawings. Only landscapes, scenes from the Bible, scenes from life can be very completed drawings, but very often these are intermediate sketches, which unfortunately did not interest his contemporaries or collectors and the vast majority of his preliminary drawings has been lost.

    Rembrandt had many students who drew in his own way, and since most of the drawings were neither dated nor signed, it can be extremely difficult to date and attribute Rembrandt's drawings for sure.

    After facing bankruptcy and the sale of his house, his press, his collections and his goods in 1658, Rembrandt had to move in 1660 and concentrated on painting. We have fewer drawings corresponding to the period 1660 - 1669.



Rembrandt's method of study

   When Rembrandt takes a close look at a scene for a few seconds or imagines an ephemeral scene, he breaks down the difficulties into several steps to understand them.

    In the first step, Rembrandt analyzes and tries to understand the construction and/or the movement of the scene. But he will draw the scene in a completely different way if he observes a static or quasi-static scene (that is to say in slow motion) or whether he observes a scene in quick motion (for example dancers or a man mounting a horse). In the case of a static or slow moving scene, Rembrandt's drawing practically represents a photo and is similar to a freeze-frame based on the film he is observing, while in the case of a fast moving scene, Rembrandt's drawing represents an overlay of photos from the film. To illustrate the two variants of this first stage, we will present two drawings: the "Couple of Beggars with a Dog" and the "Rustic People Dancing". When Rembrandt observes a scene part of which is quasi-static and part of fast motion, he combines the two variants in the same drawing. This is for example the case in the drawing: "A man helping a rider to mount his horse".

    In the second step, Rembrandt tries to understand the expression of the characters or animals on the scene. To illustrate this second stage, we will present two drawings: "The Sacrifice of Manoach" and "Three Soldiers Having Fun With Women". Some studies combine the two methods of the first step as well as the second step. In one part of the drawing, Rembrandt studies the composition of the scene and in another part, he analyzes the motion and finally in a third part he studies the expression of the characters or animals (see the drawing "Two Horses in the Coaching Inn").

    In the third step, Rembrandt places shadows and lights to show the hierarchy of plans and the volume of the scene. To illustrate this third step, we will present the drawings "The soldier at the Brothel", "The Naughty Boy", the "Young Woman Lying Down" and the etching "The Angel Leaves Tobit and his Family".

    These studies show Rembrandt's extraordinary ability to memorize, understand and translate the characteristics of a scene he observed for a few seconds, as well as his exceptional drawing ability. Note that when Rembrandt tried to understand a problem, some details of the drawing did not interest him and he treated them in a sloppy or careless manner, which made critics say that Rembrandt did not know how to draw!

   A great characteristic of Rembrandt's work is that he never drew, etched or painted a given subject in the same way twice. In order to keep the freshness and spontaneity of the drawing, Rembrandt would change the drawing of the scene significantly when he moved from one step to the next or from one technique to another, drawing then etching, drawing or etching then painting. This, moreover, allowed him to study several ways of representing the scene while solving the technical difficulties it contained. This way of doing things allowed him to tackle a given theme over several decades without ever repeating himself and it shows Rembrandt's exceptional faculties of imagination and memory. It should be noted that these exceptional faculties can be maintained and worked on. Let us quote the example of Katsushika Hokusaï who decided to draw a different lion every day and who produced several hundreds!


First step

   When Rembrandt draws scenes corresponding to the first step, he draws the sketch on the spot just after observing the scene (observation which lasts about thirty seconds at most).


Couple of Beggars with a Dog

   "Couple of Beggars with a Dog" (circa 1647-48, Benesch, B 751, Schatborn, S 390), {Albertina, Vienna}. The drawing shows how Rembrandt studies the problem of building an ephemeral quasi-static scene, that is to say in slow motion. The lines are simple and delimit the shapes of the characters and the dog. It does not deal with any precise details, the hands, the clothes ... and yet it already perfectly translates the atmosphere of the scene, the walking of the characters and the contrast of the sleeping children behind the parents. It is a real freeze-frame based on the film that Rembrandt is watching. This sketch shows Rembrandt's extraordinary faculties for memorizing and analyzing a scene that he observes for a few seconds. It must be remembered that Rembrandt drew everyday in his studio of course, but especially when he was walking, he drew in the street, in the countryside, in taverns and all the places where he could observe life (at the doctor's office, at the slaughterhouse…).

   "Rustic People Dancing" (circa 1635, Benesch, B 258 verso), {Graphische Sammlung, Munich}. This drawing represents a couple of rustic people dancing at a party. Rembrandt drew the couple twice on the same sheet. This drawing shows how Rembrandt studies the problem of the quick motion which may characterize an ephemeral scene and how the treatment that he realizes is totally different from what he does in the case of a quasi-static scene. He analyzes and seeks to understand movement, but does not precisely define the shape of the characters. No detail is treated, it suggests, in a few strokes, how the dancer who pulls the lady wiggles his hips. It increases the impression of movement by multiplying the arms of the dancers and the legs of the lady. The drawing represents an overlay of photos from the film he is watching (see also the drawing "Two Horses in the Coaching Inn"). The illusion of dance emerges from this sketch made in a few lines. Rembrandt does not seek to accurately represent the dancers but rather to suggest their movement. At the end, he draws and represents the faces of the woman, who obviously have fun, while he simply suggests the head of the man. This final step corresponds to the second step, in which he expresses the feelings of the characters.

Combination of the two variants of the first step

   When Rembrandt observes a scene part of which is quasi-static and part is rapid movement, he combines the two variants in the same drawing.

   “A man helps a rider to mount his horse” (circa 1637, Benesch, B 363 recto, circa 1640-41, Schatborn, S 48), {Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam}. Rembrandt observes a man helping a rider to mount a horse. This sketch allows him to analyze and understand the movement of the rider. The quasi-static part corresponds to the horse and the man standing beside it and the fast moving part corresponds to the rider who mounts his horse. Rembrandt draws the quasi-static part very simply as a freeze-frame, he draws the back of the horse and one leg, he suggests the head and the neck of the horse and the man helping the rider to mount. Rembrandt draws the rider who has his left foot in the stirrup and who holds the saddle with his left hand, as he is mounting the horse. He draws it by a superposition of images which describe the movement. It splits the right arm and the bust, and triples the rider's right leg. On the reverse side of the paper sheet is drawn "A rider with a quiver", suggesting that immediately after this study done after observing the rider mounting a horse, Rembrandt turned the sheet and drew a rider wearing a feathered hat, on his horse. He will later use this sktech in the etching “The baptism of the eunuch” (1641). To keep the freshness and spontaneity of the line, Rembrandt engraves a variant of the sketch and does not reverse the drawing (it is interesting to compare the reverse of the sketch and the rider of the etching). Legend says that when Rembrandt had finished these sketches he went to a tavern with one of his pupils. The latter, after looking at the sketches said to Rembrandt: "Master, you should explain your sketches, because one day an expert might write: "Rembrandt tried to draw a rider mounting a horse, but he does not seem to have found a clear solution… This indicates that Rembrandt did not draw from a model but worked from memory ... " and that: "the drawing made on the back is not by you but have been added by a merchant to make the sketch of the rider mounting more attractive for sale !" (P. Schatborn 1985). Rembrandt's response did not reached us, but it is easy to imagine. The sketch "A man helps a rider to mount his horse" was used as preparation for the realization of the rider of the painting "The concord of the State" (1637 – 1645, Museum Boijmans, Rotterdam).

Second step

   "The Sacrifice of Manoach" (circa 1637-40, Benesch, B 180, circa 1635, Schatborn, S 54), {Kupferstichkabinett, Berlin}. Manoach and his wife, who cannot have children, sacrifice a lamb. From flames appears an angel who announces that they are going to have a child. This child, Samson, will deliver Israel from the yoke of the Philistines. It is the most beautiful drawing representing the appearance and the flight of an angel which was made by Rembrandt. This study fits the second step in problem solving. Once he analyzed and understood the movement in a previous step, he represents it and expresses the feelings of the characters he draws. In this study, it represents the flight of the angel, the recoil due to surprise, the amazement and fear of Manoach and his wife. He studies the positioning of the arms and hands of the characters as well as the legs of the angel to increase the feeling of movement, but he is not interested in representing precisely of other details, such as the hands of the characters or the feet of the angel. Rembrandt has been criticized for not knowing how to draw hands or feet. But for Rembrandt this is a minor detail at this level of the study and one can admire the hands of the etching "Portrait of Jan Cornelis Sylvius". He works in detail on the expression of Manoach's face and more succinctly that of his wife's face. One can admire the freedom of the line, the unpredictable direction of the line for the representation of the angel and how in a few lines it translates the ephemeral nature and emotion of this scene. This study is characteristic of Rembrandt's manner and technique. After the second stage, when he had finished solving the preliminary difficulties, Rembrandt generally made an engraving or a painting, but could also make a very accomplished drawing. In the third step he places the shadows and lights in the case of a drawing or an etching and adds the colors in the case of a painting. The drawing of the angel from the study "The Sacrifice of Manoach" was used again by Rembrandt in the painting "The Angel Leaves Tobit and his Family" painted in 1637 and in the etching "The Angel Leaves Tobit and his Family" done in 1641.


   "Three Soldiers Having Fun with Women" (circa 1635, Benesch, B 100 verso, Schatborn, S 31), {Kupferstichkabinett, Berlin}. This drawing was made at the same period as the drawing "Rustic people dancing". This drawing corresponds to the second step. Rembrandt solved the problem of the construction of couples, what interests him here is the expression of the characters. The soldier in the foreground tries to put his hand between the legs of the woman who reacts violently, she tries to withdraw his hand and is about to slap him. Rembrandt splits the woman's right arm to show its movement and favors the expression of her face. In the case of the second couple Rembrandt shows the characters having fun while caressing.

Combination of steps 1 & 2

   "Two Horses in the Coaching Inn" (circa 1637, Benesch, B 461, circa 1629, Schatborn, S 460), {Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam}. Two horses pulling a carriage stop to rest. The driver places a blanket on the horses and a woman feeds one of the horses. This study is particularly remarkable. It combines the two methods of the first step as well as the second step of Rembrandt's method to draw an ephemeral scene. To begin Rembrandt realizes the quasi-static part or freeze frame which allows him to build his drawing, this first step corresponds to the carriage, the coachman, the blanket and the woman. Their representation is made very simply without any details. Then, he draws the horse's head in the background. The horse eats the fruit that the lady holds out, this corresponds to the study of the movement of the first step. Rembrandt splits and even triples the layout of the horse's head showing the movement of grabbing the fruit and starting to chew. This is an example of repentance used to suggest movement (see also the drawings "Rustic People Dancing" and "A man helps a rider to mount his horse"). Duplication to indicate movement was already used in the Paleolithic or Neolithic (in ancient Egypt for example). And finally, Rembrandt draws in detail the expression of the horse's head in the foreground, its neck and its four legs, which corresponds to the second step of its method of study. It should be noted once again the extraordinary faculties of memorization and analysis of Rembrandt who watches for a few seconds an ephemeral scene.


Third step

   "The Naughty Boy" (circa 1635, Benesch, B 401, Schatborn, S 238), {Kupferstichkabinett, Berlin}. This drawing corresponds to the third step. Rembrandt solved the problems of construction, movement and expression of the characters. He places the shadows and lights to give the impression of volume. To strengthen the violent and ephemeral nature of the scene, Rembrandt draws the shoe of the child which has just come off his foot and which is falling. If he draws with great attention the movement of the two women and the child, as well as the expression of the faces of the women and the three children, he very succinctly draws the hands of women and especially their feet. Rembrandt concentrates his work on bringing some part of the drawing to the spectator’s attention and translating the nature of the scene.


The Soldier at the Brothel

   "The Soldier at the Brothel" or "The Soldier at the Tavern" (circa 1642-43, Benesch, B 529), {private collection}. This drawing is generally called "The Prodigal Son in the Company of Women of Easy Virtue" or "The Prodigal Son at the Tavern", however the man has a dagger on his belt and his sword is placed along the armchair to the right of the drawing. It therefore seems unlikely that it was the prodigal son. This drawing is an example that fits the third step, it represents a miniature painting. We will notice the freedom of the line and the simplicity of the sceneries, Rembrandt is interested in recreating the atmosphere and the expression of the characters who have fun.



The Angel Leaves Tobit and his Family

   "The Angel Leaves Tobit and his Family" (1641), {Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam}. Archangel Raphael leaves Tobit and his family after treating Tobit's father's blindness. Tobit's family thanks the angel who flies away and disappears. In this completed etching, Rembrandt resume consideration of the study of the angel of the drawing "The Sacrifice of Manoach". This etching corresponds to the third stage and is a variant of the painting from 1637: "The Angel Leaves Tobit and his Family". One of the characteristics of Rembrandt is that he can be interested in a subject for several years and provide very different representations. In the etching, he focuses on the family of Tobit and the expression of the characters. Note that for Rembrandt, the little dog represents the symbol of the loyalty of Tobit's family towards the Archangel Raphael whereas in the Bible the dog is a harmful animal which has a very bad reputation. This shows that when Rembrandt draws a biblical scene, he signs it with his personality and always makes his point of view predominate over generally accepted conventions. Rembrandt draws only the bottom of the angel who takes flight suggesting the quick disappearance of the angel in the eyes of Tobit's family and the spectator who witnesses an ephemeral scene.


Lying Young Woman

   "Lying Young Woman", probably Hendrickje Stoffels (around 1655-56, Benesch, B 1103, around 1654, Schatborn, S 441), {British Museum, London}. This drawing is done with brush and ink and is one of Rembrandt's masterpieces. It gives an idea of what Rembrandt could achieve when he had finished solving the early difficulties. One can practically find the sequence of the brush strokes according to the ink charge that remains in the brush.


The freedom of Rembrandt's line


   Rembrandt's passion for freedom influenced his way of drawing. Indeed, one of the characteristics of its line is the freedom of its line and sometimes a completely unpredictable way of drawing. To keep this freedom, Rembrandt never closes his drawing when he creates it. We say that we close a drawing if the first lines that we put constrain the continuation of the construction of the drawing. For example, you can draw a head with only an oval if you want to make a quick construction during a first step, but you should not start with an oval if you want to make a portrait. If we draw a scene with several characters we first place them then we draw the background to finish. To keep the line free, constraints must come as late as possible during the drawing process. To illustrate our point, we will present two examples of studies for the painting "Saint John the Baptist Preaching".



Preliminary Study

    "Preliminary Study" (circa 1637 by Benesch, B139A), {Private collection} for the painting "Saint John the Baptist Preaching". At this stage of the work, Rembrandt draws the heads with ovals because he does not want to draw the details, to make portraits. First, he places the characters or groups of characters, then he settles or aligns the elements of the scenery. This drawing matches Rembrandt's first step of study.


   "Studies of a Seated Woman" (circa 1633, Benesch, B179, circa 1639, Schatborn, S 343), {Musée du Louvre, Paris}, used in the painting "Saint Jean-Baptiste Preaching". Rembrandt when he wants to draw the portrait of the first seated woman does not draw his face with an oval shape while he does so for the second because he does not want to detail her face. As Rembrandt wants to have the most continuous line possible (he does not want to draw fragments of lines one behind another), it is often very difficult for him to draw the hands well, for example. In the case of the study of the first woman, Rembrandt focuses on the expression of her face and her left hand. Note that if her left hand is not very well drawn, it translates perfectly by itself the fact that the woman is poor and begs for money or food. Rembrandt has been criticized for not being able to draw hands or feet. Nevertheless, for him this is a minor detail at this level of the study and one can admire the hands of the etching "Portrait of Jan Cornelis Sylvius". These two studies of a seated woman were followed by a third different study and it will be noted that the three studies are different from the final painted version.


   When he focuses his interest on a particular character in a group, it is very interesting to see how Rembrandt draws the group while avoiding to close/constrain his drawing. We will present the two drawings "Guided by an Angel, Lot and his Family Leave Sodom" and "Lot and his Daughters" in which Rembrandt focuses on the main characters, most notably Lot.


   "Guided by an Angel, Lot and his Family Leave Sodom" (circa 1636, Benesch B 129), {Albertina, Vienna}. Led by an angel, Lot, his wife and daughters leave Sodom which is going to be destroyed by God. The angel warns them not to turn back, his wife who will turn back to see Sodom will be transformed into a salt statue. Lot and his daughters will take refuge in a cave (see "Lot and his Daughters"). This remarkable drawing was constructed in the same way as the previous one. In order not to close his drawing, Rembrandt begins with the character of Lot who is very detailed with the shadows to indicate the volumes, then he draws the angel and the wife of Lot who surround him and guide him and finally he ends with the representation very succinct of his two daughters who follow them. This drawing is also a very good example of a study sheet which contains the three characteristic steps of Rembrandt. The last interesting point is the attribution  problem of this drawing. Indeed, on the back of the sheet is a drawing probably made ten years before by a pupil of Lastman. Thus that is why some experts said this drawing would not be from Rembrandt but could be a copy of a drawing of Rembrandt made by Govert Flinck? or Jan Victors? in the years 1640-45. Legend says that when Rembrandt took this sheet to draw, one of his students told him: "No Master, do not take this sheet to draw, otherwise in three hundred years some experts could downgrade your drawing! ". Rembrandt shrugged and made his drawing.


   "Lot and his Daughters" (circa 1636, Benesch, B 128, circa 1638, Schatborn, S 57), {Klassik Stiftung, Weimar}. After leaving Sodom which is destroyed by God, Lot and his daughters take refuge in a cave which contains wine which God has placed there. The two girls find themselves alone with their father because their fiancés did not want to follow them. The eldest daughter is afraid of not being able to have descendants in this isolated place, she decides to get drunk her father so that he makes her pregnant and advises her young sister to do the same. Together with his eldest daughter, Lot had a son named Moab who founded the Moabite kingdom. With her youngest daughter, he had a son Ben-Ammi who founded the kingdom of the Ammonites. The drawing represents the girl who, with her hand, encourages her father to hold the cup to drink while he begins to get drunk. In order not to close his drawing, Rembrandt begins with Lot and makes a very detailed representation of him, except for his legs which are succinctly drawn. Then he draws the expressive face and the hand of his eldest daughter (?) who encourages his father already under the influence of alcohol to keep on drinking. Finally he finishes by sketching the young girl and some elements of the decor. This drawing is a very good example of a study sheet which contains the three characteristic steps of Rembrandt. It was preceded by a very finished drawing "Lot and his Daughters" (circa 1631) which is generally attributed to the Rembrandt school but may have been by Rembrandt and was diffused through Jan van Vliet's 1631 etching.


   Finally, note that Rembrandt's drawing can also be characterized by a drawing line which is completely unpredictable and which is of the greatest virtuosity. By this process Rembrandt suggests what he wants to represent without drawing it precisely. Generally Rembrandt uses this process when he finishes a drawing in order not to give the impression of rigidity but to give to the drawing an impression of life and freshness. For example, we can observe this type of line in the portrait of Saskia from 1633.


Portrait of Saskia

   "Portrait of Saskia" (detail of the drawing dated 1633 and annotated by Rembrandt, Benesch B 427, Schatborn, S 629), {Kupferstichkabinett, Berlin}. Rembrandt drew a portrait of Saskia on June 8, 1633, three days after their engagement. It is a drawing made with a silver point on parchment. He first draws the face, hat and left hand of Saskia, then he draws the right hand. Note that this right hand does not have the delicacy of the other hand and is a man's hand, the hand of Rembrandt who offers a flower to his wife, his beloved. Then ends the two sleeves and the shoulder of Saskia's coat with drawing lines completely unpredictable. Its layout suggests the shoulder and the two sleeves without explicitly drawing them. It produces a much more beautiful result than what the normal drawing of the sleeves could have been. It is a way of drawing Saskia's clothes without closing the design.

   For Rembrandt the most important is not to draw accurately the whole thing but to work on which interests him in the drawing and which allows him to express what he wishes, the part which must catch the eye of the observer. This way of treating the subject is also found in certain paintings executed after 1650. Note also that in the treatment of the subject of drawing or etching developed by Rembrandt, the theme of the subject becomes secondary to the breathe of life brought into his drawing or etching. To illustrate all of what we have just developed, we present the "Study for the Lamentation of Jacob" and the painting "Woman bathing in a Stream" by Rembrandt as well as the lithograph "The Mother and her Child" by Käthe Kollwitz and the print "The Great Wave of Kanagawa" by Katsushika Hokusai.



Study for the Lamentation of Jacob

   "Study for the Lamentation of Jacob" (circa 1635, Benesch, B 95, Schatborn S 40), {Kupferstichkabinett, Berlin}. Jacob, grandson of Abraham, had twelve sons who founded the twelve tribes of Israel. He laments because the Lord has destroyed all his homes. We can find in this study all that we explained previously. Rembrandt represents Jacob begging a specter which appears to him in his distress. Jacob believes that it is a vision of God whereas it is probably the specter of his twin brother Esau because the vision of the face of God causes death. Jacob is the father of Joseph. Potifar's wife accused him saying he wanted to seduce her.

Woman Bathing in a Stream

   “Woman Bathing in a Stream” (1654), {National Gallery, London}. In this painting, Rembrandt focuses on the face of the woman who enters the water, he shows the pleasure of the woman who is going to take a bath. The face is the only part of the painting that is treated with great delicacy and finish. On the other hand, the dress is painted with great virtuosity, with large brushstrokes and with a lot of impasto. The right hand of the woman lifting up the dress is painted very succinctly, but if you don't look at it in detail, it doesn't shock. To translate the movement of the woman entering the water, Rembrandt paints and highlights the ripples caused by the woman's legs in the water of the stream. This way of painting was totally misunderstood by Rembrandt's contemporaries, who criticized him for making unfinished paintings.


The Mother and her Child

   "The Mother and her Child" (1916, Lithography) by Käthe Kollwitz. In this remarkable lithograph, Käthe Kollwitz wants to translate the love between a mother and her child. The viewer's eye is attracted by the expression of the faces of the mother and the child. Note that the mother's hands are drawn very roughly, which does not disturb the vision of the work.



The Great Wave of Kanagawa

   Katsushika Hokusai print called "The Great Wave of Kanagawa" which is part of the series of thirty six prints dedicated to Mount Fuji. Although Mount Fuji is a sacred mountain and the fishermen living at the same period as Hokusai are considered to belong to the lowest level of society, for Hokusaï the life of the fishermen and their extreme living conditions were more important than the Mount Fuji.



Evolution of Rembrandt's line

   Finally, it should be noted that Rembrandt's drawing line evolved a lot towards the end of his life after about 1655. After his move in 1660, Rembrandt produced very few etchings, for press had been sized. It is also possible that his production of drawings has decreased, and in any case, we have few drawings corresponding to this period. This evolution was intensifying after the death of Hendrickje Stoffel in 1663. We will illustrate this evolution of Rembrandt's line with the drawing of "Diane and Actéon".



Diane and Acteon


    "Diane and Acteon", (circa 1662-65, Benesch - B 1210, circa 1656, Schatborn, S 161), {Kupferstichkabinett, Dresden}. Rembrandt broachs this theme again in his late period by making a free transposition of an engraving by Antonio Tempesta (1555 – 1630). This drawing is probably one of Rembrandt's last known drawing. If the drawing remains very free, it simplfies considerably and the curves are often replaced by straight lines, the line becomes less flexible, more angular, more rudimentary. Rembrandt uses more gladly uses reed or bamboo, which provides a vigorous line but at the same time very nuanced. Nevertheless, we note the extraordinary efficiency in representing the heads and faces of Diane and her followers. After Hendrickje's death and all the trials he had faced before, Rembrandt who is beyond pain, wants to avoid the superfluous brilliant, to simplify and to go to the essential. The unpredictable lines no longer appear in his drawings from the late period. This development was perhaps amplified by health and vision problems. It is also found in his paintings. This evolution confused his admirers who felt his paintings were unfinished and no longer wanted to buy any, but Rembrandt no longer cared about the opinions of his potential clients.


The perception and representation of volume by Rembrandt

    As previously mentioned, Rembrandt never drew the scenes he was studying in the same way twice, and the final version of the scene he wanted to represent was different from the studies he had made of it. This method of working allowed him to understand in volume the subject or scene he was studying. Arnold Houbraken (1660 - 1719) reports about Rembrandt: "He frequently sketched a face in ten different ways before reproducing it on the canvas". As a draughtsman, engraver and painter, Rembrandt has always wanted to represent and translate the volume of the scene which he reproduced so that the spectator who looks at one of his works has the impression that he is not observing a frozen scene and projected in two dimensions on a plane but a lively and natural scene. He had this desire to make the work that the spectator observes more human. Rembrandt realized very early on that one way to solve this problem was the use of light and dark and more generally the play of shadows and lights. This already appears clearly in the painting "The Parable of the Rich Fool" (Gemäldegalerie, Berlin) painted in 1627 during his third year after the establishment of his studio in Leiden. In his paintings to increase the effect of volume, Rembrandt very often represents the background of the painting out of focus.



Parable of the rich fool


   The most extraordinary example of etching in Rembrandt's research to give the viewer the impression of volume, life and nature is the portrait of Jan Cornelis Sylvius.



Portrait of J C Sylvius

   "Portrait of Jan Cornelis Sylvius", Rembrandt (1646), {Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam}. Rembrandt inflicts the spectators to follow one vision angle by drawing a beveled-cut perspective of the removable frame. The spectator’s point of view is on the right, slightly lower than Jan Cornelis. The light also comes from the right but it’s source is higher than Jan Cornelis. To increase the impression of volume, Rembrandt draws the right hand, the book and Jan Cornelis’ head out of the image plane and draws their shadows on the removable frame. The result is a lively portrait, full of humanity. Rembrandt manages to go beyond the story, the portrait is not just a simple projection on the sheet of paper.



Table of contents